In this pool, a photo distributed by Russian state agency Sputnik, Russian President Vladimir Putin (LR) is walking alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping and North Korean leader Kim Jong.
Sergei Bobilev | AFP | Getty Images
The potential threats arising from the “anti-West alliance” have reached volatile levels as top security experts warn Washington and its allies should not underestimate the importance of warming relations between China, North Korea, India and Russia.
On the sidelines of the Ambrosetti Forum held in Cernobubio, Italy on Friday, CNBC’s Steve Sedgwick, chairman of the Munich Security Conference Foundation Council, Wolfgang Isinger, labelled the recent convening of China’s world leaders as “worried.”
Last week, Chinese President Xi Jinping hosted more than 20 foreign leaders at a military parade in Beijing. Among them were North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Xi was also portrayed laughing with Chinese President Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
“I’m worried about these photos,” Isinger told CNBC. “We know there is no perfect harmony between India and China, but the world is moving in the wrong direction here.”
Ischinger holds numerous posts focused on foreign policy, including positions at the Council of Europe on Diplomatic Relations and at the Atlantic Council of Washington, DC, and was previously the German ambassador for the United States.
He told CNBC that concerns about the rise of the authoritarian regime and the decline of democracy have shifted concern about the extent to which totalitarian leaders are trying to join forces.
“I think we need to accept the fact that there is at least the potential for an anti-Western alliance built to create at least some kind of global order.
“That’s not the kind of scenario we’re interested in. So I think these photos from China are bothering me.”
China, India and Russia reunite on Monday at a virtual summit of BRICS countries. This is a bloc made up of Brazil and South Africa, and it was a light corn from US President Donald Trump on “anti-American policies.”
During the BRICS summit, representatives from countries discussed how to take a swip in the White House tariff regime and deepen the alliance’s trade ties.
Beijing: “Pursuing the New World Order”
In an article published Monday by Seong-Hyon Lee, a senior fellow at the George Howe Bush Foundation for George Heina Relations and a researcher at Harvard University’s Asia Asia Center, those who dismissed these strengthened bonds due to the lack of formal alliances between North Korea, North Korea and Russia, warned that they “lack of deep functional partnerships.”
“The summit and parade (last week) were the public manifestations of deep changes in China’s strategic attitude: deep “psychological decoupling” from the West,” he said. “Beijing concludes that strategic reconciliation with Washington is no longer a viable goal and is now actively pursuing a new world order.”
Lee labelled it as “Victory,” consisting of “the stiff nucleus of this new posture,” consisting of Xi, Putin and Kim.
“The most dangerous mistake that Washington and its allies could make is to misdiagnose the nature of this challenge,” he said. “To stick to the lack of formal alliance is to prepare for the final war. The threat is… a fluid, adaptable network operating in the seams of international law, exploiting ambiguity and plausible denial.”
But Evgeny Roschchin, a visiting scholar at Henry A. Kissinger Global Affairs of Advanced International Study, said he doubts the alliance could go far beyond its current form.
“The SCO Summit is not a traditional military alliance and will likely never be,” Roshchin said of the events in China last week.
He told CNBC in an email that concerns over relations between the countries were “well established” as continued trade with Moscow supported Russia’s wartime economy, particularly when Russia was involved.
However, Roshchin pointed out that Beijing has not committed to providing military support to Russia, and that both China and India have expressed unease in Russian nuclear rhetoric.
Subscribe now
“What the summit revealed was not a more cohesive block than a collection of states with clear ambitions that can tactically align with a particular domain, but lack the unified commitment expected under the NATO-style Article 5 framework,” he said.
“China…is not intended to build such unity. Rather than sharing political solidarity or value-based alliances, it promotes flexible, multi-level engagement. It promotes cooperation in which profits converge and space for liberation elsewhere.”
However, Roshchin acknowledged that China had considered these alliances as part of its long-term strategy. There, we were able to establish a new “pole” to improve profits on multinational platforms like the United Nations.
“It’s no coincidence that President XI has consistently expressed strong support for the United Nations,” he said. “The impact of this emerging pole could lead to wider support for China’s position in global governance.”
